As Costs Fall, Battery Storage Is Surging

This piece from TWW’s Greg Brophy originally ran in RealClear Politics on May 28th and can be accessed here.

As Costs Fall, Battery Storage Is Surging

By Greg Brophy

Over the past 25 years, our lives have changed in so many ways. But one of the biggest changes would have to be the role that batteries play in our everyday activities.

Smart phones, laptops, tablets, hybrid cars and fully electric vehicles – we are literally surrounded by these technologies which all, to some extent, are built around batteries.

As a farmer and state legislator from Colorado’s Eastern Plains, I remember turning heads by driving a Toyota Prius – the first hybrid-electric car to be a commercial success – in the late 2000s. Years later, however, it was no big deal when I traded up to a hybrid SUV.

Ironically enough, one area where batteries have been slow to take off is the power grid itself. But that is quickly changing.

In the space of a few years, the U.S. power sector has added 16 gigawatts of battery storage capacity, according to 2023 data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. For scale, a large nuclear power plant has a capacity of roughly 1 gigawatt.

The biggest reason is pure economics: Over the past decade, the cost of battery storage has fallen by more than 80%. By the end of this year, battery capacity on the U.S. power grid could almost double to 31 gigawatts, the EIA predicts.

This will provide a critically important source of backup electricity for the power grid during severe weather and other interruptions.

It’s also a big deal for renewable energy facilities, everywhere from wind farms on the Eastern Plains to stand alone storage facilities on the Western Slope. Batteries can store electricity from the all sources of generation on the grid including wind and solar so it can be used around the clock, not just when the wind is blowing and the sun is shining.

As a national leader in all forms of energy, Colorado is not sitting on the sidelines when it comes to battery storage.

Colorado is currently the seventh largest battery storage state. We have about 20% more battery storage than New York, in fact.

Plans on the table would add almost 2 gigawatts of new battery storage capacity in Colorado by 2030 – a roughly eight-fold expansion of our current capacity.

One example of this trend can be found where the rural electric cooperative United Power is expanding its battery storage portfolio to keep up with rapid growth of about 6% per year.

“The use of batteries on our distribution network is essential to a resilient and responsive power system, and we are excited to be moving ahead with one of the most aggressive plans for such a system,” Mark Gabriel, United Power’s President and CEO, said when the expansion was announced.

“These battery arrays will allow us to balance our power needs throughout the day and incorporate local renewables more efficiently.”

Another project worth watching is happening in Pueblo. Xcel Energy is partnering with a company called Form Energy to build a long-duration energy storage facility next to the Comanche coal-fired power plant. 

The battery will use iron-air batteries – an alternative to lithium-ion technology – to store electricity from solar and wind facilities for up to four days at a time. 

To be sure, energy storage projects have their critics. Some of the loudest voices point to a 2019 explosion at an energy storage facility in Arizona, which injured nine first responders.

At the time, energy storage facilities were still very new and the firefighters had not received specialized training, as they receive for other kinds of energy infrastructure like electrical transformers or oil and gas wells.

However, since then, the National Fire Protection Association has developed standards and training courses to fill this gap. In addition, energy storage systems receive the same regulatory scrutiny as other pieces of infrastructure on the power grid that we live and work around every day without any safety concerns.

And personally, I can say that over the past 17 years, I’ve driven more than 600,000 miles in two different vehicles, each with sizable batteries, and I’ve never had any reason to worry. Like other energy technologies, from fracking to rooftop solar panels and everything in between, the risks are manageable and are actively being managed.

For decades, Colorado has been an “all of the above” energy state, where new energy sources and innovations are welcomed, because they provide more choice and competition in a critical economic sector.

As we write the next chapter of Colorado’s energy storage, it’s clear that battery storage will be one of the promising new technologies that will join with others to support our economy and our way of life.

 

Greg Brophy is a farmer and former state senator from Wray, Colo. He is the Colorado director for The Western Way. 

Navigating the Energy Landscape: Anticipating AI's Impact on Power Consumption

In the vast landscape of technological advancement, Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands as a promising changes across industries and societies. As AI permeates deeper into our daily lives, from smart assistants to autonomous vehicles, one crucial consideration emerges: its impact on energy consumption.

The integration of AI into various sectors brings both unparalleled efficiency gains and heightened energy demands. AI is expected to require much more energy in the years ahead. Demand is estimated to ramp up from 8 terrawatt-hours this year to 652 terrawatt-hours in 2030. A terrawatt-hour is equivalent to consuming 1 trillion watts of power for an hour, according to interim CEO for American Electric Power Co. (AEP), Ben Fowke.

"Demand for electricity was almost flat for two decades. We are now beginning to see this trend reverse - driven by large customers such as industrial manufacturers, data processors and others who require significant amounts of power," Fowke said as he spoke before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

Understanding and mitigating these energy needs is paramount as we navigate this technological advancement.

Unleashing Efficiency:

AI's greatest allure lies in its ability to process vast amounts of data and perform complex tasks with unprecedented speed and accuracy. This prowess translates into efficiency gains across industries. For instance, in manufacturing, AI-driven predictive maintenance minimizes downtime, optimizing energy usage in production processes. Similarly, in transportation, AI-powered route optimization reduces fuel consumption and emissions.

Surging Demand:

However, the proliferation of AI comes with a surge in computational requirements. Deep learning algorithms, a cornerstone of AI development, demand substantial computational power, often facilitated by data centers brimming with servers. These data centers, essential for training and running AI models, constitute a significant portion of global energy consumption.

Moreover, as AI applications become more sophisticated, the demand for computational resources escalates. From training complex neural networks for medical diagnostics to simulating climate models for environmental research, AI's hunger for computing power knows no bounds.

Tackling the Challenge:

Addressing the energy needs of AI requires a multifaceted approach:

  1. Optimized Algorithms: Developing energy-efficient AI algorithms is crucial. Researchers are exploring techniques to streamline model architectures, reduce computational redundancies, and optimize resource utilization without compromising performance.

  2. Hardware Innovation: Advancements in hardware, such as the development of specialized AI chips and quantum computing, hold promise for more energy-efficient computation. These technologies aim to deliver higher performance with lower power consumption, driving sustainability in AI development.

  3. Renewable Energy Integration: Powering AI infrastructure with renewable energy sources can significantly mitigate its environmental impact. Data centers can leverage solar, wind, or hydroelectric power to reduce carbon emissions associated with AI operations.

  4. Efficient Infrastructure Design: Implementing energy-efficient cooling systems and server designs in data centers can curb energy consumption. Adopting modular and decentralized architectures also enhances flexibility and efficiency in AI deployment.

  5. Regulatory Measures: Governments and regulatory bodies can incentivize energy-efficient AI development and enforce standards for sustainable computing practices.

A Collaborative Endeavor:

Addressing the energy needs of AI requires collaboration among stakeholders. Industry players, policymakers, researchers, and environmental advocates must work hand in hand to steer AI development towards sustainability.

As we embark on this journey, it's imperative to recognize that the energy footprint of AI is not an insurmountable obstacle but a challenge ripe for innovation and collaboration. By harnessing the transformative potential of AI while mindful of its energy implications, we can pave the way for a more sustainable and technologically advanced future.

The trajectory of AI's energy consumption is pivotal in shaping our collective tomorrow. By embracing innovation and fostering collaboration, we can harness the full potential of AI.

Community solar drives choice, competition on the power grid

This piece from TWW’s Greg Brophy ran in The Fence Post and the Greeley Tribune.

Community solar projects are surging as consumers seek more choice, competition on the power grid

By Greg Brophy

Choice and competition are hallmarks of well-functioning markets and conservative economic policies. But in the energy sector, increasing the amount of choice and competition available to consumers hasn’t been easy.

Historically, the electrical grid has been dominated by centralized, large-scale power plants. Homes and businesses didn’t have any choice in the matter — either they accepted the electricity from those big power plants or they went without electricity.

In recent years, this has started to change. The introduction of market-friendly policies and falling technology costs have allowed homeowners and businesses to generate their own electricity. The most visible example is rooftop solar, but even this option has its limitations.

First, if you’re renting a home or leasing your place of business, then you don’t own the roof. But even in cases where the occupant of a home or business owns the building, not all rooftops are suitable for installing solar panels. Shade from nearby trees and buildings, along with other environmental factors, can effectively rule out the installation of solar panels in some cases.

Thankfully, however, an additional breakthrough in market-friendly energy policy has given people who can’t directly generate their own electricity another option. That breakthrough is known as community solar.

Through community solar programs, even those who can’t install solar panels on their own rooftops can subscribe to a much larger shared solar facility. Through the subscription, they are effectively buying a percentage of the facility’s electrical output. Then, that electrical output is credited towards the utility bill of the homeowner or the business owner who purchased the subscription.

Under this model, subscribers to a community solar project are able to take control of their own energy use without having to own a property that’s conducive to installing solar panels. And for grid operators, community solar creates a useful “in between” option that’s bigger than individual rooftop solar installations but smaller than the large-scale solar arrays that connect directly to the bulk power system.

The size of these community solar projects — which are sometimes called solar gardens — makes them suitable for both rural and suburban communities in Colorado. Since these projects come in all shapes and sizes and their popularity is taking off all across Colorado. The experience of Denver-based solar developer Pivot Energy really tells the story.

In 2022, Pivot Energy completed a total of seven community solar projects in Weld, Logan and Crowley counties. These projects, which have a cumulative generating capacity of 13 megawatts, signed up more than 1,700 households and businesses as subscribers. At the same time, the Weld RE-5J School District signed up as a subscriber, which is expected to save the district almost $400,000 in utility expenses over 20 years. In Weld County alone, these community solar projects are expected to generate $1.4 million in property taxes, most of which will go towards public education.

For its next major project, Pivot Energy is dramatically scaling up the community solar concept even further. The company was selected by Xcel Energy to build 41 megawatts of new community solar projects, which will also exclusively serve lower-income households.

As part of this new portfolio, Pivot Energy is taking their farm-friendly designs even further at a site in LaSalle that will feature solar energy production, food crop production and irrigation. The subsurface drip irrigation system maintains the landowner’s water rights, is expected to save 33% water usage, increase crop yields and lower the cost of production. At this initial solar cropping site, a local Weld County producer will cultivate in between and around the solar array which occupies ~32 acres of land. This new configuration will serve as a template that Pivot Energy hopes to replicate as they scale up community solar in Colorado.

To be sure, community solar projects still represent a small share of Colorado’s overall electric power portfolio. But it’s growing fast, because the policies around community solar are built on a solid foundation — providing more choice and competition to consumers.

As long as that foundation remains intact, you can expect to see more and more community solar projects being developed all over the state.

Brophy, of Wray, is a farmer and former state senator. He is the Colorado director of The Western Way

2024 Washington D.C. Fly-In

TWW joined the Conservative Energy Network and Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions for a fly-in to Washington D.C. on April 30th and May 1st.  TWW met with 16 Congressional offices from AZ, CO, NV, UT, and WY to discuss the importance of All of the Above Energy policies to protect rate payers and keep energy costs competitive, permitting reform at the Federal level to speed the buildout of critical infrastructure, and rural economic development opportunities for the West. 

TWW Tours Largest Battery Storage System in AZ

On April 24th, TWW hosted ACC Commissioner Lea Marquez Peterson and ACC Candidates Renee Lopez and Rachel Walden on a tour of the Sonoran Energy Center in Buckeye, AZ. 

The 260 MW solar and 260 MW battery energy storage system is one of the newest in the state and the largest operation battery energy storage system in Arizona.

The Sonoran Energy Center was a $600 million dollar investment which created 500 construction jobs and will result in $17.5 million in tax revenue for the City of Buckeye.

Utah must be better at planning for electricity needs

This piece from TWW’s Steve Handy was first published in the Deseret News on April 16, 2024 and can be accessed here.

Opinion: Utah must be better at planning for electricity needs

Published: April 16, 2024

By Steve Handy, Utah director for The Western Way

Utah is currently embroiled in a debate over whether the coal-burning Intermountain Power Plant should be kept open past its planned retirement next year. I’ll steer clear of the many issues raised by SB161 — which was signed last month by Gov. Spencer Cox and would allow the state to take over the plant. But I do want to highlight one argument the bill’s proponents have made: It’s needed to boost the reliability of the electric grid.

The fact of the matter is that mounting reliability issues are less about how we generate our electricity and more about how we move that power from Point A to Point B. And the sad truth is, our aging electric grid is badly in need of modernization.

This is not just about meeting current needs; it’s about ensuring reliability, resilience and sustainability for generations to come. The Western Interconnection, of which Utah is a part, faces major reliability challenges, and expanding electric transmission is a crucial solution to addressing them.

Spanning from the Rocky Mountains to the Pacific Coast, the Western Interconnection is a sprawling network of power generation and transmission systems. It’s served our region well for decades, but is increasingly showing signs of strain — especially from the growing frequency and severity of power outages. While Rocky Mountain Power has been proactive in planning transmission for the local footprint, much more can be done to integrate within the region.

Unless we expand transmission capacity by building more transmission lines, power losses from extreme weather events will continue to leave us in the dark — as happened last month when a winter storm knocked out power to thousands in the Salt Lake City region. These have become an all-too-common feature of life in our state that not only inconveniences consumers and businesses but also poses serious public safety risks.

Inadequate transmission also leaves Utahns at risk of losing out on economic growth, which depends on access to reliable electricity. New economic engines such as data centers, artificial intelligence and manufacturing facilities spawned by recent federal investments are heavy consumers of electricity.

The demands for new power will only continue to grow. The International Energy Agency recently estimated that power demand from data centers and AI will double by 2026 – to the level of electricity consumed by Japan each year. Without a reliable electric grid to support the electricity required by these new projects, Utahns are at risk of losing out on the jobs that would be created by our changing economy.

A lack of transmission also deprives Utahns of the benefits of affordable power. Cheap clean energy is booming across the nation but can’t access the electric grid to provide that energy to customers without sufficient transmission capacity, keeping electric bills unnecessarily high.

We simply cannot keep operating under the current status quo. Our current incremental approach to planning transmission is the most expensive way to provide energy to households and businesses. In order to keep the lights on and attract economic growth, states and regions must plan transmission in a more forward-looking way that takes into account projected electricity supply and demand.

That means reforming the rules that dictate how transmission projects are planned and paid for, which are some of the biggest barriers to efficient and timely development of transmission lines. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is currently considering a regional planning and cost allocation rule that would go a long way toward improving things.

It is imperative that this final rule from FERC requires planners to take a long-term look at changing energy demand and future energy resources, as well as specify a comprehensive set of transmission benefits and a process for assigning costs in line with those benefits.

Fixing these three issues would mean a huge shift away from the status quo, and help strengthen our electric grid, unlock economic growth, and lower consumers’ electric bills.

Steve Handy is a former state legislator and the Utah director for The Western Way, an organization focused on market-competitive solutions to environmental and conservation challenges.

Lithion Bringing Battery Manufacturing to the U.S.

TWW toured Lithion, a Henderson, NV based battery manufacturer, on April 17th. Nevada Lt. Governor Stavros Anthony; Assemblywoman Heidi Kasama (Assembly District 2); Assemblyman Brian Hibbetts (Assembly District 13); and Henderson City Councilman Jim Seebock joined the tour to learn more about Lithion’s operations and battery manufacturing.

Lithion is a is a vertically integrated manufacturer of Primary & Secondary Battery Cells, Rechargeable & Non-rechargeable Battery Packs and Battery Modules that are used in a variety of products and markets including military and health care applications. Lithion is one of the few companies to manufacture batteries in the United States, starting in 2020 and expanding in a new facility in Henderson, NV. Lithion employs over 150 employees at their Henderson site and expects to add an additional 100 employees as their new facility opens.

Geothermal energy deserves the red carpet, not red tape

This piece from TWW’s Steve Handy first ran in the Salt Lake Tribune on March 20th and can be accessed here.

Geothermal energy deserves the red carpet, not red tape

Geothermal developers are drilling for zero-carbon sources of energy that can provide electricity consistently around the clock.

By Steve Handy | For The Salt Lake Tribune | March 20, 2024, 6:05 a.m.

One of the most promising energy sources in America today is geothermal, which harnesses the natural heat contained in deep geological formations to generate electricity. Tim Fitzpatrick, reporter for The Salt Lake Tribune, recently provided an excellent overview.

Using technologies and talented workers from the oil and gas industry, geothermal developers are drilling for zero-carbon sources of energy that can provide electricity consistently around the clock.

The federal government projects that 60 gigawatts of geothermal power generation could be built in the U.S. between now and 2050. That’s the equivalent of 60 large-scale nuclear power plants, or 8.5% of the nation’s projected power generating capacity by the middle of this century.

Skip Ad

Utah is already a leader in this promising sector. The Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) is located in Beaver County and the state ranks third in the nation for geothermal electricity capacity, behind California and Nevada.

Given the tremendous potential of this energy source, the federal government should be rolling out the red carpet to geothermal developers. But instead, the opposite is happening — geothermal is getting tripped up by red tape.

For this reason, Republican Utah Congressman John Curtis is spearheading legislation aimed at cutting through this bureaucratic gridlock and unleashing the full potential of geothermal in our state and across the country.

The bill — the Geothermal Opportunity Act — addresses the permitting challenges that hinder the development of geothermal energy, especially on federal land in Western states. Right now, even after a project is approved, the U.S. Interior Department is withholding subsequent approvals that are needed for construction to begin because of lawsuits that are filed by environmental groups and other special interests.

The proposed legislation is straightforward: It would compel the Interior Department to continue issuing authorizations unless a federal court nullifies the underlying drilling lease. This will do a lot to prevent arbitrary obstruction of geothermal projects in the federal court system, ensuring they can advance without unnecessary delays.

This legislation is well-timed, because permitting delays are threatening to stunt the growth of geothermal when the sector is making major breakthroughs.

Here in Utah, the geothermal developer Fervo Energy is building a 400-megawatt power project near the FORGE research facility. During construction, the project will support 6,600 jobs and when it enters operations, 160 workers will be employed there.

Fervo Energy recently reported major improvements in drilling efficiencies, which can speed up the drilling process by 70% and cut the cost of drilling almost in half. One of Fervo’s investors is Devon Energy Corp., a company that uses drilling and hydraulic fracturing to produce oil and gas.

“Fervo’s approach to geothermal development leverages leading-edge subsurface, drilling, and completions expertise and techniques Devon has been honing for decades,” said David Harris, Devon’s chief corporate development officer and executive vice president, in response to the time and cost savings.

The application of drilling and fracking technologies by Fervo Energy and other developers is one of the biggest reasons why geothermal is poised to dramatically expand.

Traditional geothermal power plants rely on extracting fluids from naturally occurring hot underground reservoirs to generate steam, which then drives turbines to produce electricity. However, this process is limited by the requirement for specific geological conditions, including the presence of hot rock, fluids, and underground fractures.

Enhanced geothermal systems can operate in underground areas lacking these natural geological conditions. Leveraging fracking technology borrowed from the oil and gas sector, enhanced geothermal developers can inject fluids into artificially created fractures to produce the steam needed for power generation.

But this technology is only useful if project developers can get the permits and other authorizations needed to start building new geothermal power plants.

That’s why geothermal permitting reform proposals — including Congressman Curtis’s bill — deserve to become law.

Red tape shouldn’t be allowed to hold back the development of innovative new energy technologies that increase choice and competition on the power grid. But without action from Congress, that may happen in the case of enhanced geothermal technologies.

That wouldn’t just be a loss for Utah — it would be a major missed opportunity for the country as well.

Steve Handy is a former Utah legislator and Utah director for The Western Way with a focus on fiscal, conservative, market-competitive solutions to environmental and conservation challenges.

NV Supports EV's without compromising consumer choice

This piece from Nevada Assemblywoman was first published in the Elko Daily on March 8, 2024 and can be accessed here.

Kasama: Nevada supports EVs without compromising consumer choice

·       HEIDI KASAMA

·       Mar 8, 2024

In most markets for goods and services, American consumers have choices. Why should the market for transportation fuels be any different? It shouldn’t, of course, and Nevada is quietly leading the country towards a truly open and competitive market for the fuels that make our cars and trucks run.

For more than a century, individuals and businesses effectively had once choice — petroleum. Gasoline and diesel continue to dominate the transportation fuels market. But major improvements in battery and fuel cell technologies have provided another choice — electricity.

Now, in typical fashion, some special interest groups aren’t satisfied with people choosing electricity over gasoline or diesel. Instead, they have tried to force electric vehicles into the market through government mandates.

The most obvious example is California, which is banning the sale of cars and SUVs powered by gasoline or diesel by 2035 — just 12 years from now.

The trucking industry is also in the sights of California’s bureaucrats and politicians. Newly purchased trucks that move freight between ports, railyards and distribution centers must be electric. Thankfully, Nevada is moving in a different direction — one that embraces the promise of new fuels and consumer choice, and, above all, trusts consumers to decide for themselves.

In this year’s legislative session, I had the honor of co-sponsoring AB184, championed by Assemblyman Howard Watts and subsequently signed into law by Gov. Joe Lombardo. This groundbreaking law establishes an incentive program for the acquisition of medium- and heavy-duty electric vehicles, powered by either batteries or hydrogen fuel cells. Additionally, one key aspect of this bill that resonates with me is the utilization of federal funds for incentives, ensuring that no state money is involved. When we collaborate across party lines, our community reaps the benefits of our collective efforts.

The legislation, which passed the Nevada Assembly with strong bipartisan support, reduces the upfront cost of purchasing electric trucks and buses for companies, independent truck operators, nonprofits, local governments, state agencies and other private and public fleet owners. The amount of the incentive varies by the size of the vehicle, and the potential purchaser of an electric truck or bus gets to decide if buying a vehicle powered by a battery or fuel-cell makes sense for their own needs.

This makes the program much more workable — and much less of a political lightning rod — than a California style mandate that ignores the individual needs of a business or a local government. For some purchasers, an electric truck or bus makes sense right now. For others, it may take years before switching .

The creation of Nevada’s new Clean Trucks and Buses Incentive Program is also an important reflection of the state’s role in developing and building the technologies that will support a truly competitive marketplace for transportation fuels.

Last year, Gov. Lombardo announced that Tesla would be investing $3.6 billion to expand its existing Gigafactory in Nevada. The investment would add an electric semitruck manufacturing plant and a battery assembly plant capable of producing enough batteries for 1.5 million electric vehicles per year.

The Tesla news was followed by a $2 billion U.S. Department of Energy loan to battery recycling firm Redwood Materials, which is planning a major expansion of its existing Nevada plant.

Once complete, the recycling plant is projected to produce enough batteries to power 1 million electric vehicles per year.

Nevada’s policy on electric trucks and buses is based in reality, not good intentions or political ideology. The successful adoption of new technologies takes time. It is driven by personal choice, as individual consumers weigh the costs and benefits of trying something new or sticking with what they have for a while longer.

The government didn’t mandate the use of smartphones or streaming apps. It shouldn’t try to force people in electric vehicles either. Because at the end of the day, if electric vehicles prove themselves to be a better product, they will sell themselves without the need for any heavy-handed mandates.

Heidi Kasama is a Republican Assemblywoman from Clark County. She wrote this opinion piece for the Elko Daily Free Press.

UT State Sen. Ipson Proposes Commonsense Measure to Improve Air Quality

Utah’s Senate Bill 170, Clean Truck Incentive Program is a commonsense way help increase air quality along the Wasatch Front and the rest of the state through the use of incentives rather than mandates.

Sponsored by Senator Don Ipson, (Dist 29) the legislation would transfer of $6 million over three years for a new grant program within the Utah Division of Air Quality for eligible purchasers of clean fuel trucks. 

The bill has the support of the Utah Trucking Association and other groups:

“As the Utah Trucking Association reviews legislation regarding alternative fuel options, we very much appreciate Senator Ipson’s approach in SB170.  This bill provides incentives to consider alternative fuel vehicles rather than significantly expensive mandates.  SB170 allows companies to explore electric vehicles that otherwise would be unattainable due to the extraordinary price gap between today’s diesel powered trucks and the currently available electric vehicles.”

Utah’s populous Wasatch Front, a 100-mile corridor where 80% of the state’s population resides, can experience notorious winter-time inversions that result in considerable air pollution especially dangerous to sensitive populations.

Since 50% of Utah’s air pollution is derived from trucks and vehicles, this bill would allow for additional steps to be taken to reduce air pollution from medium and heavy-duty vehicles.

TWW thanks Sen. Ipson for this incentive based policy that will help improve Utah’s air quality.

For energy and tech innovation, look to Wyoming

This opinion piece from TWW’s John Karakoulakis was originally published in the Washington Examiner on February 19, 2024 and can be accessed here.

For energy and tech innovation, look to Wyoming

By John Karakoulakis

February 19, 2024 7:00 am

When you believe in the power of innovation, so-called problems are actually future business opportunities.

That’s the story of a pioneering company, Crusoe Energy Systems, which is using a waste product from the oil and natural gas industry to make waves in the technology sector. And it wouldn’t have happened without Wyoming’s willingness to explore bold new ideas and foster innovation.

Crusoe Energy Systems builds portable data centers that can be placed on remote oil and gas well sites. The data centers use field gas that would be vented or flared (in other words, wasted) as their power source.

This helps to solve a big problem for the technology sector. More and more people are storing data and running computer programs through the “cloud” — remote servers that connect to your laptop or cellphone via the internet. But the continued expansion of cloud computing means more and more data centers are needed, and these data centers are very energy-intensive.

The team at Crusoe Energy Systems realized that the cheapest forms of energy never make it to the grid. Instead, they are “stranded” in the remote locations where energy is often produced, whether it’s an oil and gas well in rural America or a hydroelectric dam in Iceland.

If that stranded energy could be harnessed and used to power data centers, it could provide a cost-effective way to boost the tech sector’s cloud computing capacity. Not only that, but eliminating wasted energy would be good for the environment, too.

The idea of building portable data centers, moving them around to different locations in the oil patch, and remotely connecting them to other cloud-computing facilities was not the simplest idea to sell, according to Crusoe Energy Systems cofounder Cully Cavness.

The first place to let the company test out the concept was Wyoming in 2018, Cavness said in a recent interview on 60 Minutes.

“That’s not necessarily an idea that everyone’s going to embrace automatically right off the bat before it’s been done before,” Cavness said. “Wyoming was. They invited us to come do it for the first time here. We did it at a small scale. We proved that it could work. And that helped us attract the funding and the other projects that had helped us scale to where we are today.”

The company now has around 200 portable data centers powered by 20 million cubic feet per day of gas that would otherwise have been wasted, according to Cavness. That’s the equivalent of removing the carbon dioxide emissions of several hundred thousand cars from the atmosphere every year.

More recently, Crusoe Energy Systems has taken the lessons learned from limiting wasted energy in the oil and natural gas industry and applied them to limit energy waste in the renewable energy sector. Imagine that: a tech startup with roots in the oil and gas industry teaching wind and solar developers about how to limit waste and help the planet.

It’s not surprising that a company that got its footing in Wyoming would think this way and see these opportunities. Despite the stereotype of Wyoming being a fossil-fuel state, Wyoming is without doubt an “all of the above” energy state.

What that means is we don’t see artificial dividing lines between different energy sources. They all have their place, and they can all work together.

By definition, the all-of-the-above attitude is open to new sources and new technologies, whether advanced nuclear reactors or carbon capture and sequestration.

This approach to energy and innovation is personified by Gov. Mark Gordon (R-WY), who has taken heat from left-wing environmental groups and even some members of his own party for not treating different energy sources as “good” or “bad.”

“I have spoken, and will continue, to speak to audiences inside and outside Wyoming with the message that Wyoming provides energy of all types, and that our future — America’s and the world’s — depends on all types of energy,” Gordon wrote in a recent column.

Wyoming has a proud history of being open for business for all sources of energy. If we want to secure a prosperous future for the Cowboy State, then staying open for business is the right approach to take.

John Karakoulakis is the director of the Western Way, a nonprofit organization focused on free market solutions to western U.S. conservation issues.

The U.S. Military Looks to Geothermal for Secure, Firm Power

This piece from TWW’s John Karakoulakis originally was published by Real Clear Energy on February 5, 2024 and can be accessed here.

The U.S. Military Looks to Geothermal for Secure, Firm Power

By John Karakoulakis
February 05, 2024

There’s much more to renewable energy than just wind farms and solar arrays – and some of those renewable sources have more in common with conventional fuels like oil and natural gas than you might think.

That’s especially true in the Western U.S., where some of the latest breakthroughs in renewable energy are based on technologies that have been used for decades to harness our abundant fossil-fuel reserves.

The best example is geothermal energy, which involves the same drilling and hydraulic fracturing technologies used in oil and natural gas production. But instead of producing oil and gas, geothermal wells are drilled to access the constant source of heat that exists in deep rock formations.

There are different variations of this technology, but in general, cold water is pumped down the well and circulated back to the surface hundreds of degrees hotter. With the help of a heat exchanger, the hot water is used to drive a turbine that generates electricity without any emissions. 

Unlike wind turbines or solar arrays, electricity production from geothermal doesn’t rely on weather conditions, making it extremely reliable. And for this reason, the U.S. military is showing more interest in geothermal technologies to harden its facilities against power grid outages and cyber-attacks.

At Mountain Home Air Force Base, for example, officials recently announced a project that aims to use geothermal electricity as a source of “clean, reliable baseload energy, even in the face of grid outages.”

The U.S. Air Force has contracted with Zanskar Geothermal and Minerals to look at the feasibility of developing an on-site geothermal power plant within three to five years. A similar project is underway in Texas at Joint Base San Antonio with a different geothermal energy developer, Eavor Inc.

These projects will serve as prototypes to test the concept of using round-the-clock geothermal energy as an uninterruptible power source for military installations of all kinds. This work is urgent in light of state-sponsored cyberattacks from America’s geopolitical rivals – first and foremost, China.

“We are in an era of strategic competition with China, which means our installations are no longer a sanctuary from the full spectrum of threats,” said Dr. Ravi Chaudhary, Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Energy, Installations and the Environment. “Geothermal sources strengthen our energy grids and give us the ability to isolate threats before they impact our operations.”

As with so many technologies used by the military, there are major civilian applications as well. Power companies in the Western U.S. already use geothermal technologies to generate some of their electricity, and the level of interest in this zero-carbon energy source continues to grow.

For example: In Utah, startup company Fervo Energy has received federal permits to drill dozens of geothermal wells with a combined generating capacity of about 90 megawatts, after successfully piloting the technology in Nevada. In addition, in Nevada and Colorado, fellow startup Transitional Energy has been exploring the use of existing oil and gas fields as new sources of geothermal energy. 

Nationwide, over the next three decades, U.S. officials project that geothermal electric capacity could grow by 60,000 megawatts. For scale, that is the equivalent of building two large scale nuclear plants per year for 30 years.

In addition to supporting our energy needs, just think about the job creation potential, especially for workers in the oil and gas sector, who already know all there is to know about drilling and fracking.

Most good ideas make sense for more than one reason. In the case of geothermal energy, it makes sense for reasons of national security, energy independence and job creation, not just environmental stewardship. 

Geothermal also offers an important lesson about what the nation’s energy future will look like. It won’t involve scrapping all the energy sources we currently have and starting over from scratch, as some would have you believe. Instead, the energy technologies of the future will mostly come from new applications of the technologies we have today.

 

John Karakoulakis is director of The Western Way, a nonprofit that seeks pro-market solutions to environmental challenges.

Mesa County can learn from counties that have embraced renewables

This piece from TWW’s Greg Brophy originally ran in the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel and can be accessed here.

Mesa County can learn from counties that have embraced renewables

Feb 4, 2024

As Mesa County draws up new solar regulations, other rural communities offer lessons in the impact of wind and solar projects

Rural communities in Colorado have seen a surge of renewable energy investment in recent years. The falling cost of wind and solar technologies has made them attractive for individual landowners who want to take control of their own energy usage, not to mention independent power producers who want to develop larger solar arrays to sell electricity into the grid.

In Mesa County, local officials have seen a significant increase in permitting requests for solar, and last month, this prompted the county commission to approve a six-month moratorium on any project approvals.

As a former state legislator who fought on the front lines of Colorado’s oil and gas political wars, I have to admit, moratoriums make me nervous. But in this case, I believe that the Mesa County Commission is headed down the right path.

Taking a brief pause to study the lessons learned from other rural communities with significant renewable energy investment is a wise move. Landowners, project developers and all other stakeholders will benefit from a cohesive strategy and clear ground rules for the expansion of solar power in Mesa County.

Between now and the expiration of the moratorium in July, county commissioners and interested citizens may wish to examine the lessons learned from the Eastern Plains, where I’m from.

Around 15 years ago, our rural communities became very attractive destinations for renewable energy investment. The plains being what they are, most of the investment was wind, of course, but we did see a significant number of solar projects too.

Let’s be frank: The idea of our pro-oil and gas, politically conservative communities embracing wind and solar seemed strange at first. But in time, it actually made a whole lot of sense.

The conservative approach to energy policy, in my humble opinion, is “all of the above.” And on the Eastern Plains, we got to see how that works on a local level.

Adding wind farms and solar arrays didn’t mean taking away oil and gas. Quite simply, it just grew our economy and created another way for farmers and ranchers to make their land even more productive and profitable.

We also found that the wider community benefited in a number of ways.

During the construction phase, we saw a significant bump in construction jobs and associated spending, which helped boost local businesses and increased sales tax revenues for cities and towns.

Then, over the longer term, our communities also saw a boost in property tax revenues as a result of the capital investment that went into these projects and the value of the electricity they continue to generate.

In the words of one county commissioner from the Eastern Plains, these renewable energy projects “generate a lot of property tax revenue, which helps school districts, fire districts, county government, city government and other local services in our community.”

A few years ago, I started working with a conservative non-profit that looks for pro-market energy solutions, especially in rural communities. We commissioned a study on how renewable energy investments had strengthened the economy of Eastern Colorado, in partnership with regional development organizations Action 22 from Southern Colorado and Progressive 15 from Northeast Colorado.

Overall, the report found a long-term economic boost of $5.9 billion from wind farms, solar arrays and energy storage projects. Again, this wasn’t substituting for oil and gas, agriculture and other existing industries – it was added on top of them.

To be clear, I’m not suggesting that billions of dollars of solar energy investment is about to come rushing into Mesa County and surrounding communities. For the Eastern Plains, this was a 15-year to 20-year process.

But this much is undeniable: Our corner of the state is much better off because of this investment, and we’d love to see other parts of Colorado enjoy the same success. 

Greg Brophy is a former state senator and a fourth-generation corn and melon farmer from Yuma County. He is the Colorado director of The Western Way.

How Arizona sends solar power to your light switch, long after the sun goes down

This piece was originally published in the Arizona Central on January 30, 2024 and can be accessed here.

How Arizona sends solar power to your light switch, long after the sun goes down

By Andy Tobin

Markets that have more choice and competition are better for consumers.

The energy market is no different.

In the past, our choices were mostly limited to a handful of fuels — coal, oil, natural gas, nuclear and hydroelectricity.

But the falling cost of renewable electricity — a roughly 60% to 80% reduction, in the case of wind and solar — has given power companies and consumers more options to choose from.

Now, another technology is entering the marketplace — the battery energy storage system — and Arizona is playing a leading role in its wider adoption.

Batteries store electricity from solar panels

In Arizona, batteries can store electricity generated by solar panels in the middle of the day until times of peak demand in the late afternoon and evening. Just as the cost of solar-powered electricity has fallen, so has the cost of batteries — by around 80% over the past decade, in fact.

With even greater cost reductions predicted in the coming years, there’s been a surge of interest in battery energy storage projects in Arizona, especially those built alongside large-scale solar facilities.

Utilities are building numerous projects, and they have also reached agreements with private energy storage developers to dramatically scale up battery energy storage capacity in the greater Phoenix area.

Utility initiatives have played a primary role in driving the advancement of the state’s energy storage marketplace, surpassing the influence of government policies.

  • Most recently in Coolidge, Salt River Project (SRP) cut the ribbon on their largest battery energy storage project yet. The new Saint Energy Storage II project, developed and operated by NextEra Energy Resources for SRP, adds a 100-megawatt battery energy storage system, creating enough energy to power about 22,500 homes for four hours during times of peak demand. 

  • NextEra Energy Resources has also pursued other projects in the Phoenix area, including the $210 million Storey Energy Center in Pinal County, which pairs 88 megawatts of solar energy with 88 megawatts of battery energy storage.

  • The much larger, $600 million Sonoran Solar Energy Center in Buckeye combines a 260-megawatt solar array with 260 megawatts of battery energy storage, making it the largest battery energy storage project in the state.

  • In north central Arizona, a massive 1,200 megawatt solar and battery energy storage facility is being developed outside Flagstaff. The CO Bar Solar facility will provide electricity to Arizona Public Service and SRP.

Utilities are rapidly adopting this technology

SRP has been operating a 25-megawatt battery energy storage facility in Peoria since 2021, next door to its Agua Fria Generating Station, which produces electricity from both natural gas turbines and solar panels.

The battery facility can power approximately 5,600 residential homes and enhances grid reliability by storing excess energy during low-demand periods and supplying it during peak hours, reducing costs while meeting customer demands. 

In Avondale, SRP is working with Plus Power to build the Sierra Estrella Energy Storage facility, a 250-megawatt battery installation.

Battery energy storage projects are also being pursued in southern Arizona as well.

  • Tucson Electric Power is planning a $294 million 200-megawatt battery energy storage facility — the Roadrunner Reserve System — with enough capacity to power 42,000 homes for four hours during peak evening usage times.

  • And in Cochise County, Arizona Electric Power Cooperative recently announced plans for close to 300 megawatts of battery energy storage to be built alongside the existing Apache power station.

It stabilizes the grid, keeps power affordable

This isn’t meant to be an exhaustive list of all the battery energy storage projects that are either in service or being pursued in Arizona today.

In fact, so much is happening in this area, it’s hard to keep up.

But it’s crystal clear that battery energy storage is rapidly expanding in Arizona, which will benefit the stability of our power grid and allow the state to make even more cost-effective use of its natural resources.

Put another way, thanks to energy storage, you’ll still be able to use solar power after the sun goes down in Arizona. That’s quite an accomplishment, not to mention a victory for consumer choice.

Andy Tobin is former speaker of the Arizona House and a former member of the Arizona Corporation Commission. He is president and owner of Tobin Business Solutions LLC, and director of The Western Way’s Arizona Rural Energy Network. Reach him atandy@tobinbusinesssolutions.com.

Rural Utah could be selling electricity to urban areas, but more transmission lines are needed

This opinion piece from TWW’s Steve Handy first ran in the Desert News on January 18, 2024 and can be accessed here.

Opinion: Rural Utah could be selling electricity to urban areas, but more transmission lines are needed

Rural communities can profit from clean energy, if there are enough power lines to move their electricity to market

Last November, I participated in a summit in Salt Lake City entitled Mountain West Renewables. The conference was attended by both developers and policymakers. One recurring theme was the critical need for additional transmission lines and capacity.  

Domestic energy production of all forms — and especially renewable energy — is a major economic opportunity for rural Utah especially. But to fully realize this opportunity, rural communities need the ability to move the energy they produce to the population centers inside and outside our state where most of that energy will be consumed.

The state’s $23 billion agricultural sector relies heavily on roads, highways and interstates to transport cattle, sheep, wheat and alfalfa across Utah and all across the country. But those roads didn’t get built on their own.  

In the early 20th century, farmers played a pivotal role in the “good roads” movement, which lobbied for the creation of today’s modern road network. More recently, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has noted that “well-maintained roads are indispensable to support the transport and economic competitiveness of agricultural goods.” 

In the 21st century, the new challenge is building power lines, which will allow rural communities to sell electricity from solar arrays and other energy sources to consumers in Salt Lake City and other major urban centers across the western United States.

In short, our leaders need to start thinking of transmission lines as roads for electricity

Thankfully, construction has already started. PacifiCorp’s Gateway lines and the TransWest Express Transmission project, originating in southwestern Wyoming, will help, but much more is needed.

The White House announced last week a $1.25 billion initiative for lines from Arizona to New Mexico, and another from Nevada to Utah will soon get underway. This is good news. 

In 2019, the Utah Legislature commissioned a study on the need for additional transmission as the state’s population explodes. The initial key finding was that while Utah has excellent electric generation potential and development activity, future generation buildouts will increase congestion on the transmission grid. The study suggested that Utah may need to accommodate between 5.5 and 9 GW of new generation capacity by 2040 that would double the amount of generation capacity online in the state at present. This buildout could lead to a $3.6 billion increase in state domestic product by 2040. 

These proposed projects include new power lines to support the growth of renewable energy in Utah.

According to an economic impact study on the impact of renewable energy in Utah commissioned by The Western Way in 2022, the total direct and indirect benefits of annual renewable energy operations in Utah will be an estimated $154.4 million in total output ($87.8 million direct output plus $66.6 million indirect and induced output) produced by 568 employees (147 direct employees plus 421 indirect employees) earning a total of about $32.1 million ($13.2 million direct earnings plus $18.9 million indirect earnings).

The permitting process for approving transmission line projects has been famously slow — TransWest Express being the most egregious example that required 15 years and billions of dollars from inception to groundbreaking earlier this year. 

Utah as a whole, and especially its rural communities, can’t afford anything close to those kinds of delays. 

Just like the network of roads, transmission lines are indispensable for the interconnected power grid that underpins our economy and way of life — even if they don’t directly serve our homes or businesses. They also forge economic links between electricity-producing rural areas and electricity-consuming urban areas.

Federal, state and local officials need to find ways to streamline the permitting process for new transmission lines and address unwarranted opposition to these projects. Electricity is becoming a vital commodity for rural America, and transmission lines are the roads that connect producers to consumers.

Just as better roads transformed agriculture in the past, better electricity transportation infrastructure can revitalize rural America today. Let’s pave the way for a brighter energy future and make these projects exist in the real world and not just on paper.

Steve Handy, a former Utah legislator, is the Utah director for The Western Way, conservative stewards of the Western environment. 

Governor Gordon's "All of the Above" Energy Strategy Gets Local and National Attention

Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon is leading his state with a strong "All of the Above" energy strategy that is promoting Wyoming’s existing fossil fuel resources, diversifying the economy with new industries, creating new jobs, and driving serious investment into the state.  Governor Gordon is also maintaining the second highest approval rating in the country for a Governor (74 percent approve, 16 percent disapprove) according to the November polling from Morning Consult.

Governor Gordon recently outlined his strategy in an opinion piece entitled, Wyoming Needs to Be Bullish About Energy! which highlights the opportunities for Wyoming’s energy leadership.  Governor Gordon said: 

“In contrast to standing idly by, or squawking, “You're all wrong” as we witness our most valuable industries decline and the jobs they provide vanish, rest assured I will continue to forcefully advocate for the kinds of technological advances like enhanced oil recovery that benefit from carbon capture and provide a path forward for our industries to thrive. For the record, no matter one’s views on climate, all of our energy is valuable. New technology can make it better and more abundant. It is time for Wyoming to press her established leadership on energy, the environment, and private property to her advantage. Wyoming is a place where jobs, careers, and opportunities should flourish rather than languish.”

At the local level, county commissioners in Wyoming understand the importance of a strong energy policy in building local economies.  This month, Carbon County, WY Board of Commissioners passed a resolution and published an opinion piece supporting Governor Gordon’s energy strategy.  In a piece that ran in the Cowboy State Daily, the Carbon County Commissioners said:

“To remain a leader in U.S. energy development, Wyoming must not only continue to support traditional energy production but also insert itself as a leader in emerging energy resources. Governor Gordon and other state leaders have done exactly that and these specific actions will benefit the Wyoming economy for years to come.”

The rest of the county is also taking note of Wyoming’s leadership, this month, 60 Minutes highlighted Governor Gordon's efforts in a piece that detailed Governor Gordon’s background as a rancher and why he is working to position Wyoming as an energy leader well into the future.  The piece also highlights energy companies working in Wyoming that are creating jobs and benefiting the environment. 

Colorado firm brings age-old technology into the 21st Century to help forests, farms and emissions

This piece from TWW’s Greg Brophy first ran in The Fence Post on November 17, 2023 and can be accessed here.

Colorado firm brings age-old technology into the 21st Century to help forests, farms and emissions

By Greg Brophy

If there was a single technology that could reduce wildfire risk, improve the health and productivity of farmland, and keep carbon emissions out of the atmosphere, would you want to see that technology succeed?

If the answer is yes, then you may also be interested to know that a leading developer of this technology is based right here in Colorado, yet another example of our state’s leadership on energy and environmental issues.

The technology in question is biochar, which is created when wood and other organic materials are superheated in an oxygen-limited environment. Instead of burning and releasing carbon dioxide, which happens at lower temperatures, a chemical reaction called pyrolysis converts the carbon in the wood directly into biochar, a charcoal-like substance with very high carbon content.

Once converted into biochar, the carbon from dead trees, construction waste and other sources of timber is locked in place — it won’t be released into the atmosphere through burning or through decomposition.

Instead, that carbon can be mixed into farmland soils to help with water retention, the exchange of nutrients between crops and the soil, and improving the overall soil structure. “Biochar has many properties that have potential to enhance soil fertility,” according to the Colorado State University Extension Service.

The highly concentrated carbon in biochar can also be used by industry in a range of products, including plastics and road asphalt. And every ton of carbon that’s stored in biochar prevents more than three tons of carbon dioxide being released into the atmosphere.

To be sure — the process of making biochar isn’t new. Thousands of years ago, it was used in South America’s Amazonian Basin to make agricultural soils more fertile and more productive. More recently, the U.S. Forest Service has used biochar as a way to promote regrowth in places where forests have been damaged or destroyed.

But the idea of using biochar on a much larger scale is new — and that’s where the Colorado firm Biochar Now enters the picture.

Based in Berthoud, Biochar Now builds and operates specially designed kilns that produce the high temperatures needed for pyrolysis to take place. The kilns are portable, meaning they can be moved to areas with large areas of dead and diseased trees or large stockpiles of industrial wood waste.

The technology has caught the attention of state lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.

For example: In 2017, the state legislature examined the technology’s potential and concluded it could create a cost-effective way to reduce the number of trees killed by insects and disease on forest lands. Removing this “excess biomass” could “minimize the number and severity of wildfires” in Colorado, the lawmakers concluded.

“We have around a hundred million truckloads of rotting dead trees across the West that need to be cleaned up and hauled out,” Biochar Now’s CEO, James Gaspard, said in a recent interview. “If we don’t use them for biochar, that wood would just be sitting there waiting for the next fire to come through.”

Meeting the energy and environmental needs of our country in the decades ahead will require some major technological breakthroughs. But it would be a mistake to overlook the innovations that are built around existing technologies and practices, some of them age-old.

Biochar is one of those technologies, and it holds the promise of limiting the catastrophic wildfires that have plagued our state, while at the same time helping our farmers.

It’s no surprise that a Colorado firm is leading the charge to scale up this technology. The kind of pragmatic thinking you see in Colorado and across the rest of the Western U.S. is something that the debate over energy and environmental policy in Washington, D.C., badly needs.

Brophy is a farmer and former state senator from Wray, Colo. He is the Colorado director for The Western Way

Arizona’s pro-business climate is a magnet for clean energy investment, but won’t last without skilled workers

This piece from TWW’s Jaime Molera first ran in the Arizona Capitol Times on November 29, 2023 and can be accessed here.

Arizona’s pro-business climate is a magnet for clean energy investment, but won’t last without skilled workers

Jaime A. Molera

Arizona has a strong track record of attracting new business investment and job creation across a host of economic sectors, including aerospace, bioscience, financial services and technology. Moreover, the state’s commitment to low taxes, reasonable limits on business regulation and an affordable cost of living is also a magnet for investment dollars from another industry – clean energy.

But this will only last if Arizona can maintain the skilled workforce needed to translate investment dollars into actual working businesses.

To better understand this trend, The Western Way commissioned an economic analysis on 11 different manufacturing and facility expansion projects in the clean energy sector in various stages of development across the state of Arizona.

While not an exhaustive study the analysis demonstrates that Arizona is already a major destination for clean energy investment. Not only that, but these investments strengthen our economy through job creation and income growth.

During the construction phase, those clean energy investments are expected to create 87,000 jobs in the building industry. With average salaries of around $55,000 per year, those construction jobs will add more than $4.8 billion in labor income to the state economy annually.

During the operations phase, more than 22,000 jobs are expected to be created with average salaries of $60,000 per year – adding more than $1.3 billion in labor income to Arizona’s economy.

These figures aren’t just good news for our state. They also reflect a rising trend following the Covid pandemic: U.S. businesses and consumers are seriously rethinking the reliability of overseas supply chains and showing a strong preference towards products made here in the United States.

“Covid highlighted how shipping costs and shipping availability can shift tremendously depending on what’s happening on the global stage,” Peter Gibson, VP of Sales and Marketing, LG Energy Solution Vertech, said during the summer. “We genuinely believe the North American market, especially the U.S. market, to be the world’s largest and fastest-growing market for grid-scale batteries.”

The energy sector is part of this economy-wide trend, and the push to build more batteries, solar panels and other energy technologies domestically is clearly a major economic opportunity for Arizona. But to fully capitalize on this trend, Arizona leaders in business and government need to make sure that we have workers with the skills to actually perform these jobs.

Last year, a coalition of business groups – the Greater Phoenix Chamber, the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the Northern Arizona Leadership Alliance and the Southern Arizona Leadership Council – predicted a shortfall of more than 26,000 bachelor’s degrees between now and 2030, meaning that number of jobs “will not develop or go unfilled.”

“Arizona has an opportunity to become a national hub of technology, research and innovation,” the coalition said in its report. “However, unless our state meets the workforce challenges inherent in these growing industries, Arizona’s potential will be severely constrained by labor shortages.”

To prevent such a shortage, leaders in the private and public sectors should work together to expand programs like ElevateEDAZ, a program of the Greater Phoenix Chamber Foundation (where I serve as Chairman).

ElevateEDAZ partners with K-12 schools and school districts to build pathways for students to jobs in high-demand industries through career and technical training programs. Many different strategies are used, including career-focused training courses, internships, job shadows and real-time industry feedback to ensure that the skills being taught are keeping up with workforce trends.

Jobs in the technology sector are a major focus, but so are other high demand careers in other sectors, such as healthcare, construction, education and public safety.

“If the supply of skilled workers is not maintained, the state and region will continue to grow, but with lower quality jobs,” the Greater Phoenix Chamber cautioned earlier this year. “The remaining question is whether or not leaders will continue to aggressively advance the economy with an emphasis on workforce development.”

This is clearly the top priority of forward-thinking Arizona business leaders. It’s time that state and local business leaders showed the same resolve.

Jaime A. Molera is former Arizona state school superintendent, partner of Molera Alvarez, and the Arizona director for The Western Way, a nonprofit organization that builds support for market-driven solutions to environmental challenges.

Iron batteries offer an energy transition lesson

This piece from TWW Fellow SImon Lomax was first published by Cipher and can be accessed here.

Iron batteries offer an energy transition lesson

Simon Lomax -Guest Author

To build a zero-carbon economy, we need technologies that can store large amounts of energy for a long time.

With better energy storage, we can generate more electricity from wind turbines and solar panels, and then put that electricity to work whenever it’s needed and not just when weather conditions are favorable.

So far, the field of energy storage has been dominated by large batteries, and lithium-ion batteries in particular. These are the types of batteries found in cell phones, laptop computers and, on a bigger scale, electric cars.

But in Colorado, a promising new battery technology is being prepared for use by the state’s largest utility, Xcel Energy. It’s called an “iron-air” battery and, quite fittingly, it will be built in the iron and steel town of Pueblo.

Iron smelting and steel production first started in Pueblo in the 1880s. The city later became known as the “Pittsburgh of the West.” While Pueblo’s steel industry may be smaller now, rails, pipes and other steel products are still made there today.

The iron-air battery, developed by Boston-based startup Form Energy, is slated for construction on the same site as Xcel’s Comanche coal-fired power plant, which is due for retirement by 2031. The 10-megawatt (MW) battery will hold electricity for 100 hours (just over four days) and will take advantage of the existing transmission infrastructure at the site to connect to the power grid.

While iron-air batteries are less efficient than lithium-ion batteries, iron is more abundant and much cheaper than lithium. This means the cost of storage could be more than 10 times cheaper than lithium-iron batteries and come with fewer supply chain risks, according to Form Energy CEO Mateo Jaramillo.

The company also says long duration iron-air batteries and shorter duration lithium-ion batteries have complementary roles, depending on how many hours or how many days of energy storage the power grid needs at a given time.

In Pueblo, Form Energy’s iron-air battery will store some of the renewable electricity generated by nearby solar panels and wind turbines and then feed it back into the grid later, when the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing. In parallel, Xcel is developing another 10 MW iron-air battery project in Becker, Minnesota, at the site of another coal-fired power plant scheduled for retirement in under a decade.

Iron-air batteries are based on the same chemical reaction that turns iron into iron oxide, better known as rust.

The battery pulls in oxygen from the surrounding air and when the oxygen reacts with the iron inside the battery, an electrical current is generated. To recharge, this process is reversed: Electricity from a wind turbine or solar panel moves through the battery in the opposite direction, turning iron oxide back into iron and oxygen.

The battery breathes in oxygen to generate electricity and breathes out oxygen to store electricity, a process called “reversible rusting.”

Rusting isn’t new. It’s been with us since, literally, the Iron Age. Indeed, that’s the innovation behind the iron-air battery – it harnesses something old to make something new. Connecting these batteries to the power grid where coal plants have stood for decades is also a mix of old and new.

There’s a bigger lesson here about the energy transition. Extreme voices on both sides of politics assert that a new energy economy requires the total rejection of the old energy economy.

But to succeed, we’re going to need breakthroughs that apply existing technologies in new and innovative ways in addition to completely novel solutions that may take years or even decades to fully develop.

Other examples include geothermal and mining for minerals needed for clean energy.

Techniques for drilling oil and natural gas wells can be applied to the process of drilling deep below the Earth’s surface to find heat and produce geothermal energy.

Finding all the materials needed to build a wide swath of clean-energy technologies will require the mining sector, another age-old and often unfairly maligned industry.

It took great ideas and hardworking people to build the energy economy we have today, and it will take great ideas and hardworking people to build the energy economy of tomorrow.

Simon Lomax is a visiting fellow with The Western Way, a conservative nonprofit that seeks pro-market solutions to environmental challenges, and a program manager with the Payne Institute for Public Policy at the Colorado School of Mines. You can reach him at slomax@mines.edu.

Is the least populated state in the nation leading the next U.S. energy transition?

This piece from TWW’s John Karakoulakis first ran in UtilityDive on October 31, 2023 and can be accessed here.

Is the least populated state in the nation leading the next U.S. energy transition?

To the surprise of many, Wyoming may serve as the epicenter of the next U.S. energy boom.

More than two decades ago, a small group of engineers and geologists in Texas developed a process to produce natural gas from shale rock formations buried thousands of feet below the Dallas-Fort Worth suburbs. That breakthrough would later kickstart an energy boom across the United States — a trend that became known as “the energy transition.”

Natural gas from shale created a domestic energy supply that empowered the United States to break its long-standing reliance on foreign energy sources and drive historical economic growth. Power plants that burned natural gas also made the grid more flexible, supporting a major expansion of renewable sources of electricity like solar panels and wind turbines, which have dramatically come down in price but still need backup when the sun doesn’t shine and the wind doesn’t blow.

Twenty years later, the United States is on the front end of another energy transition. While traditional energy supplies remain essential to light our homes and power our cars, it is now inevitable that emerging energy technologies will have an increasing role in the U.S. energy supply. To the surprise of many, Wyoming may serve as the epicenter of the next U.S. energy boom. 

While Wyoming has the lowest population of any state in the country, it ranks as the third largest energy-producing state in the United States. It continues to serve as a top ten oil and gas producing state and is the nation’s top producer of coal. But Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon will be the first to tell you that a transition to low-carbon energy sources will be an economic opportunity for states that lead with vision and foresight.

More than 20% of Wyoming’s electricity already comes from wind turbines and that number is growing. The state is on track to become a major exporter of wind energy to neighboring states and major urban markets across the West. Based on recent infrastructure investments like the $3 billion TransWest Express transmission line project, Wyoming is better situated than perhaps any other state to lead the next energy transition. 

“We know that we don’t have time to waste,” Gov. Gordon said at the June groundbreaking for the 732-mile TransWest line in Rawlins, Wyoming, which succeeded despite fifteen years of federal permitting delays. “We have to move, with diligence, forward to make sure that we address the issue of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere with alacrity, with diligence and with dedication.”

And Wyoming’s pivot to emerging energy sources is not limited to its abundant supply of wind. Recognizing the limitations on weather-dependent sources of energy like wind and solar, Wyoming is also leading specific initiatives to promote additional innovative energy solutions.

Wyoming is hosting a partnership between utility company PacifiCorp and a leading nuclear reactor manufacturer TerraPower, to build its first reactor in Kemmerer, Wyoming — a small town with a coal-fired power plant that is due for retirement in 2025. The closure of the coal plant, without anything to replace it, would devastate the community’s workforce and tax base. The projected $4 billion investment in the new nuclear reactor presents a critical economic opportunity for this Wyoming community. The project is a “game changer,” Gov. Gordon said at the May groundbreaking of the TerraPower project.

As chairman of the Western Governors Association, Gov. Gordon has prioritized Western states taking a leadership role in the areas of carbon capture, utilization and storage, or CCUS, technology to minimize and eventually eliminate carbon emissions from coal, oil and natural gas. The development of this technology would particularly benefit Wyoming based on the state’s rich supply of fossil fuel resources and the critical role this energy source has on the state’s economy. 

Gov. Gordon recently explained the economic and environmental benefits carbon capture technologies could have on traditional energy producing states like Wyoming. “Ignoring CCUS as a viable option to decarbonize the grid creates an energy gap. Shuttering coal-fired power plants before alternative resources are fully developed will exacerbate power shortages, brownouts and blackouts, higher fuel costs and higher-priced electricity.” 

To the surprise of most Americans, Wyoming has emerged as a leader in the rapidly changing U.S. energy market. Gov. Gordon and other state leaders recognize that supporting a true “all of the above” energy plan will not only improve the climate but has the real potential to unleash a generational economic opportunity for the state.  

While so many other state leaders are stuck in neutral, focused on quantifying the actual impacts of climate change, Wyoming is taking action. State leaders like Gov. Gordon are dispatching resources to drive practical solutions that also deliver economic opportunities to businesses and working families. It is a refreshingly pragmatic and positive approach that other key players in the U.S. energy and climate debate should follow.